Skip to content

BERT NEWTON outs GRAHAM KENNEDY / DON LANE as PEDOPHILES

During his 2018 TV Logie awards speech, Bert Newton made a very clear reference to the fact that his TV star buddies Graham Kennedy and Don Lane were rampant pedophiles:

“Graham Kennedy was always the sort of man who nurtured young talent. He enjoyed giving young people a chance on television, he was a great mentor, he mentored a lot of young people. You knew if you went to his dressing room it was locked, he will be inside doing some mentoring. Don Lane was a mentor too. He did a hell of a lot of mentoring.”

Don’t fall for the media’s attempts to cover this revelation up as ‘homophobic’ or whatever PR executives are scrambling to think up. There is a difference between being gay – and raping kids! Stop lumping the two together, which is tactical, a whitewash of child sex trafficking. The #metoo movement is also being used to cover up pedophilia; it focuses on the sexual harassment and assault of adults while ignoring the entertainment industry’s main problem – child rape.

Bert Newton was talking about sex with vulnerable young children. Young child TV stars such as those who worked on ‘Young Talent Time’ and ‘Hey Dad!’ have spoken up about the culture of pedophilia within Australian TV studios. Multiple victims of VIP child sex trafficking named famous entertainers including Graham Kennedy, Don Lane and Bert Newton as pedophiles, to the Wood Royal Commission and the current Child Abuse Royal Commission.

Graham Kennedy, Don Lane and Bert Newton frequented boy brothels at Kings Cross when child trafficking there was coordinated by gangland cop Roger Rogerson who is now in prison for murder. 2005 Young Australian of the Year for community services, Dr Reina Michaelson named Graham Kennedy, Don Lane and Bert Newton as members of the VIP pedophile ring that also produced child pornography at TV studios.

These VIP pedophiles have raped kids without accountability for so long, they feel free to arrogantly boast about it on TV, as Bert Newton just did.

View the footage of Bert Newton’s Logie speech here:

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/bert-newtons-bizarre-comments-on-graham-kennedy-mentoring/video/ea8d59350657edb9e4984f0253c948e5

 

8 Comments Post a comment
  1. lynne bofinger #

    One dirty old paedo outing 2 dead paedo’s..never could stand Bert Newton from 40 years ago when I used to go to the taping of Celebrity Squares…

    July 1, 2018
    • YolZ #

      Your gut is never wrong.

      July 3, 2018
  2. Kerry #

    And all the celebrities in the audience sitting back laughing at the vile scum’s comments!!

    July 1, 2018
  3. Neita Pope #

    I think they are doing there best to make it all normal….

    July 1, 2018
  4. jameshanahan #

    Bert not only outed Kennedy and Lane, he outed himself. He very clearly says that he knew, at the time, that the other two were abusing children. And he clearly did nothing about it.

    What sort of person protects paedophiles?
    What sort of person is so ‘socially tone-deaf’ to think that paedophilia is amusing?

    July 2, 2018
  5. Joshua Vlahos #

    The Criminali list
    Who the fuck do they think they are.
    Pudrid , animals , Protected individual s
    There senses of entitlement sickens me .
    No name is to big or small

    We will name you Shane you

    July 2, 2018
  6. Alejandra #

    Absolutely disgusting and to use it in a speech thinking that the topic was amusing… amusing to who. Not to the countless of victims who are still suffering today or that have taken their own life because of the abuse they have suffered at the hands of these vermin. RIP to the countless victims and to the survivors, stand up and let your voices be heard. People united will never be defeated ….

    July 3, 2018
  7. They are all involved at some level whether media government, schools, child protection cover for child abuse anyone who wants access to children normally have other intentions, some may be good others not as Fiona Barnett story is very believable too. Fiona Barnett might want to get her story heard if she cannot get any redress as this goes deep maybe she should take it to the International judicial Commission Inquiry into human trafficking and child sex abuse. https://commission.itnj.org And one can give testimony to them on the site. In four different forms whatever suits. She is making it loud and clear I have a story yet to be exposed in my hometown all covered up right up to Government level as the solicitor and owner of the firm with the case on his books, and more than one client identical complaint on his books and lodged with local courts was a Federal MP for labour seat of Flynn yet then misleads and defers court date always then alleges all evidence destroyed and never exposes it all covered up, yet was in the public interest yet he promotes this very school of St Johns in his promotion of education campaign in his seat for Flyn how negligent to unsuspecting students and victims could still be in the school and now promoting the very school, which he knows the Diocese and defendants, of the staff from this school, are lodged through his firm and local courts, could one get a more conflict of interest than that and thus putting innocent parents and children at risk, fully knowing what he knew, had all evidence and many details he had proof which started with first principal I forced to have removed with the help of Ken Smith director general of state education and this is what he the solicitor owner of the firm as we he=is clients with his firm represented a child abusing school, horrific once it is exposed this is what he stands for , promoting a child abusing school, while we are his clients with hi firm against this very school we have litigation, leaving the plaintiffs vulnerable and unprotected yet he knows is lodged with the courts on horrific child torture and abuse , molestation of about two hundred or so but too many children involved in one school over three terms in 2004, and witnessed at the Catholic St Johns Primary school in Gladstone. Yet is promoting it as a safe environment fully knowing his firm had my files all evidence of what they did to children and he a candidate at the the for the seat of flynn and became an MP for Federal Government promotes this school. As misleading people to thinks this was a safe school it was a torture abuse, and molestation of children so terbie wa the torue of many children.. This is what he promotes while representing us never gives us our court date just leaves us exposed once it lodged courts and they are named, and they had threatened more than one victim, yet he a solicitor acting on our behalf representing us as clients with his firm yet still promoted the school this is your MP from Federal Government now a deputy Mayor who professes to help the community. Total disregard for any safety of the plaintiffs and all evidence destroyed it goes too deep in detail but It will be exposed soon I can tell literally hundreds of children detailed torture and abuse, by witness How they have got away with it , nothing to see here folks this was in the public interest to expose and this was a solicitor and MP For Federal labour Rudd government yet he leaves his clients vulnerable and promoted the very school no exposure e to how evil this palace was but encourages children and parents to enroll as education promotion, for his campaign for seat of flynn knowing what he knew and lodged filed with courts civil claim and description how disgraceful of a person we elect to keep our interest at heart and protect our rights none of which this man did utter disgrace,when I say hundreds I mean hundreds abused, in three terms i and five at a time and so on or one at a time while child waited outside could hear the abuse or made to watch while they tortured and use a specific method to paralyze the children only they can know how this was done, and it rendered them paralyzed whilst they were cut into by the named perpetrators I had named with courts from this school in 2004. When the child came out of the numbed paralysis the pain of the torturer and cut into they were screaming apparently and then given anesthetic they had every means of drugs hypodermic needles and fluoride. The thing is a boy was witnessed as having his hip cut into bone removed and then fluoride and ice inserted into his hips. The witness saw this first stage. A day later or so the boy came to tell the witness the rest of the story that he had gone to the doctor and the doctor had said what was the hip marks the boy must have told him he was cut into and the doctor was check for asthma this boy could have died from asthma attack in the office, from what he went through they would not have cared a lot of children came within an inch of their lives in that office,now as the doctor then investigated and said that the boy had a dose of fluoride and ice inserted into his bone hips and had the doctor not seen it the boy would have had to had pins and or be in a wheelchair now this boy was obviously told to look for the witness who saw him being harmed and cut into in the office, So a doctor in town knows this boy was tortured and this was a premeditated act to destroy this little boy had the doctor not found it or boy not had an appointment The boy was also skinned of flesh off this boy and other torture sen so this is the extent to what these people did, and then all of this as all evidence was with the solicitor in full fourteen or so pages of evidence of what eh witness saw. But nothing to see here folks what should have been exposed at the civil action was covered up and witnesses not protected this up to Labur Rudd government he was a Federal MP for the Labour rudd government and promotes a school with the very litigation client have against the school he is promoting, where did his allegiance lie, conflict of interest and endangering other victims by promoting this school but will be exposed soon I had named on the court documents with local courts, yet now we left undefended and all evidence was with the very solicitors firm owner who knows the full extent of all abuse has our evidence now promotes this child abusing school to innocent student. The Torture of them the children and premeditated torture details too horrific to go into. Just given an indication that there was another client on the solicitors books and one child had tired to find the witness who saw him in the office so someone wanted the boy who had the fluoride inserted to locate the witness he found the witness and started a discussion of the rest of what happened ot hi when he went to the Doctor so a child now an adult is out there and a local doctor knows this boy was tortured and Yet when the 2003 Principal was forced to resign long story twice he still kept on with Diocese after what he did and was to be rewarded new position to be with children again then I found a new victim, who was and not protected but abused mentally over the abuse further, in the office in 2003 and no mandatory reporting ever would take place the perfect pedophile child abusing school of St Johns in Gladstone Queensland, many of the teaches staff had their children in the school at that time and no one protected these children as teachers allowed the children out of class for hours and came back to class saying they were harmed and told do not care’ teachers saw a boy so beaten in class and did nothing all class saw it happen daily and then child taken to office to be tortured and all involved office staff included. and evidence he had to permanently resign but Diocese reward their abusers. Children in school now they have all the hours to abuse children, as it is the domain of the teachers, and this was the worst including office staff in n the abuse and class teachers seeing with the class a Child beaten in front of class till the fell and then he is taken to the office but the teachers of the class do nothing but watch, all and many involved in 2004 and parents wonder why children are crying and wetting bed and hiding in corners and nervous as once very outgoing, this was more than one child at the school in 2004 showing these symptom and all were abused in office all three landed up together now nervous wrecks at the local stat school together and witnessed each other being abused at St Johns that was showing these symptoms too. this how many years this went on at that school after the 2004, did any child continue to be abused as the perpetrators only once lodged courts seemed to resign and quickly as solicitors of this firm had other clients on books too, same complaint yet now all evidence destroyed, makes one think how many cover for and have information for acting for us and yet promoting the opposition with all our evidence, this is how they operate then destroy the evidence if any child was harmed after the fourth term of 2004, then they should come forward as now I had the civil solicitor in the school with his child and he was acting on my behalf through the MPs for Federal Labour owners firm all conflict of interest makes them all responsible as they knew, if any child suffers further from 2004 onward as many government and other departments notified this going back to 2003 when Ken smith removed the first principal but all lied about his resignation as well too deep to go into detail, yet if Ken smith could see a screamingly obvious situation and had the first principal removed in 2003 also l named and lodged with courts , Then how did the 2004 abuse on such a scale with no surveillance hundreds abused and tortured, yet I had continued to ask for investigation as it was to do with a child who was not rescued and they said they were in an incestuous situation in 2003 they were not rescued, and the teacher warned this oy parent of issue he would not when all is revealed on any level be rescued and the teacher knew I was calling th police for this boy for what he said happens at home with him and his siblings the teacher was told by me what the boy was aing she ten told his parent how can you let innocent child when the teacher was fully aware of situation as was the First principal even had written evidence but did no the and this to the investigating police man as police knew nothing until after the police interview father was involved and what had occurred at the the story altering stories of children so it like mild child paly from horrific abuse said to have happened,and alerting of parents of the boy who said his parents sexually molesting him and his siblings at the school of st johns in 2003, So the principal perverted the course of justice and aided and abetted a crime against a child and lied to police fobbed off the police man as truth only told to the Juvenile e aid policeman after I had to write that the boys father involved and did the detective who I had gone into see so specifically with this information could it be relayed to the Juvenile Aid worker to have a last ditch attempt to try after everyone at school teacher and principal waned the alleged pedophile parents of this child would be relayed to the interviewing office and this information so critical for the boy to get out of the situation this information that the father involved and the statement was written down but not passed on with the parent I said in familial position with the child she warns the parents and then this is how the story starts in 2003 with removal of the first principal this same child now would be abused in the office by perpetrators of the school in 2004 he had no where to turn and this is after child commission written to and brave harts I hope this boy sues as from the start the police and the school stopped him fro having natural justice, even a last ditch attempt of him being saved I went in to police station and said the father was involved with the boy and his siblings this not relayed to the Juvenile aid worker who would later interview the boy I had reported it out school not the school they the teacher and the first year principals wand he alleged pedophile parents and children bought to the office to have their stories altered, how can one later a story of sexual abuse to stick in the side so that now I was calling the police for this boy the trying to alter stories before police arrive thus aiding abetting a crime against the child being n this pedophile parental situation and warning the parents of impending police visit, as I had to mandatory report out not the teacher and principal who knew all of what the boy said his family do it together the whole family, and not one of the protected the boy both teacher knowing what I heard from the boy had said I told her I was calling the police for the boy as his parents involved she warns the parents of issue, and so now he stood no chance his parents the abusers now in the interview with where was the boys justice or right to tell his ttth then the principal also has the boy in office forced altered stories and his parent warned the boy and his sibling stood no chance his before the both up by police who did not relay the information and only know after too that the father was involved once I correspondence with him and he the juvenile worker did not get the information of the father being relayed to him by the detective, utter betrayal of a child, he now said he was sill in situation at home even when he had lied for his parents now he knew what they were doing was wrong but according to him the still molested him even after police interview in which all stories forced to change thanks to the teacher warning his parents the first safe haven and she protected pedophile alleged parents did the First principal got off on the sexual abuse of the children with another vice principal present in the office who should have been investigated as well as this woman would turn out to be a serial child abuser and tortures in with the other staff in 2004. He lied for his parents now to protect them by force had his story changed to we all do it at home to I did it but saw it on Mr Bean, no sexual connotations on Mr Bean the comedy. utter betrayal how many years as he now abuse victim in 2004 in office as witness saw him being vilely abused and molested by the perpetrators as as witness saw him being abused this child now nowhere to go he and sibling a victim at home and predators now can have him anytime at school in 2004. His voice only I heard silenced by his teacher who warned his parents and could have rescued him she had been the years how many others had she treats this way the principal in 2003 had alerted parents over the child not once but found anther victim had to have him removed even though he reigned Diocese still to get new position then found the new victim told Diocese I would go to media if got new position . Still more to story How long after 2004 he was harmed by these perpetrators with full knowledge in 2004 by the solicitors, police that these were child torturers pedophiles teachers staff at the school , some of the staff there till 2007 when my claim lodged with the courts then they scattered and resigned.The boy had his story altered but told a witness he was still being molested at home what a betrayal of this first child and his sibling and the school would rather protect pedophile parents as it turned out than innocent children just a tip of the ice berg here as to what occurred, and yet how did 2004 happen and solicitors already had extensive paperwork from the 2003 incidences at the school. Many of the police do not investigate thoroughly in this case was to alert the very perpetrators in 2004 after now the 2004 incidence police go up to school and interview the perpetrators which infact is alerting them someone has complained and they know that someone has seen hundreds being tortured molested and violated on such a level, now all evidence will be lost as now solicitor now destroys my evidence an yet through his firm lodged actually served the defendant and never agave me a court date , just delayed deferred knowing I had given them proof more victims in 2003 witnesses, documents of proof and and in 2004 new client on their books , identical claim against same perpetrators and other victims who Had contacted and verified they too hared , so nothing to do but go an settle but now why did not the very solicitor of firm I had my claim all evidence and hen hundreds of children more evidence detailed incidences of victims seen by witness yet all covered up and this did go up to Federal Member of Parliament for Labor who was a solicitor had a duty of care to all of his constituents, and community to warn then against enrolling in this dangerous school he is promoting it and that was utterly irresponsible to any children victims still in the school but would rather they not know this is a child abusing pedophile school he promotes the school and the Diocese who I have ligation against he is the solicitor representing his client myself on his firm and he promoting the very school was in the public interest no child was safe and if any were harmed from 2004 onward in September then are a lot of people to answer to if anymore children were harmed at St Johns after the solicitor knew had evidence and others knew, and never exposes the truth all evidence destroyed. The new client victim from torture abuse in 2004 on the same solicitors books from the same school he was witnessed being beaten assaulted before taken to office and other witnesses saw him tortured abused in office, in 2004 still have not got court date how is that so when that in itself is one cannot destroy evidence to be used in coming court case, or with al the details used for other victims to identify themselves fro the paperwork, this was incriminating evidence and he himself a criminal lawyer knew one cannot destroy evidence as I had not had the court settlement and this for others to use as witness and victim one saw the witness as the victim being tortured in a specific way this on the detailed paperwork given now destroyed? and if not settled and it was on the solicitors lodged with his firm now destroy my evidence whilst promoting the Diocese who I have lodged with the courts but he is promoting the Diocese and school, where I am litigating against and has all my evidence who did he have allegiance to? utter disgrace then evidence destroyed yet no court date yet. The Juvenile aid worker now alerts perpetrators once a another police interview takes place now in 2004 as witness says they have been harmed and someone had complained of abuse the juvenile aid worker goes up to school now with the child torturers and alerts them there has been a complaint so now they can regroup and and loose evidence the school was suddenly renovated and all carpets that would have shown hundreds of dna was gone and wall painted and so forth how convenient but too many children and too many details of their torture very specific done by these perpetrator named but nothing to see here folks all covered up by a solicitor who became e a MP for federal parliament of Labour no child is safe until this is full exposed as it will be and too much detail but will be exposed too many involved in covering for these pedophile rings, yet the information was with the solicitors that had allegiance to the Diocese promoting a child abusing school and thus also having the claim lodged through this firm and he is They are all involved at some level whether media government, schools, child protection cover for child abuse anyone who wants access to children normally have other intentions, some may be good others not as Fiona Barnett story is very believable too. Fiona Barnett might want to get her story heard if she cannot get any redress as this goes deep maybe she should take it to the International judicial Commission Inquiry into human trafficking and child sex abuse. https://commission.itnj.org And one can give testimony to them on the site. In four different forms whatever suits. She is making it loud and clear I have a story yet to be exposed in my hometown all covered up right up to Government level as the solicitor and owner of the firm with the case on his books, and more than one client identical complaint on his books and lodged with local courts was a Federal MP for labour seat of Flynn yet then misleads and defers court date always then alleges all evidence destroyed and never exposes it all covered up, yet was in the public interest yet he promotes this very school of St Johns in his promotion of education campaign in his seat for Flyn how negligent to unsuspecting students and victims could still be in the school and now promoting the very school, which he knows the Diocese and defendants, of the staff from this school, are lodged through his firm and local courts, could one get a more conflict of interest than that and thus putting innocent parents and children at risk, fully knowing what he knew, had all evidence and many details he had proof which started with first principal I forced to have removed with the help of Ken Smith director general of state education and this is what he the solicitor owner of the firm as we he=is clients with his firm represented a child abusing school, horrific once it is exposed this is what he stands for , promoting a child abusing school, while we are his clients with hi firm against this very school we have litigation, leaving the plaintiffs vulnerable and unprotected yet he knows is lodged with the courts on horrific child torture and abuse , molestation of about two hundred or so but too many children involved in one school over three terms in 2004, and witnessed at the Catholic St Johns Primary school in Gladstone. Yet is promoting it as a safe environment fully knowing his firm had my files all evidence of what they did to children and he a candidate at the the for the seat of flynn and became an MP for Federal Government promotes this school. As misleading people to thinks this was a safe school it was a torture abuse, and molestation of children so terbie wa the torue of many children.. This is what he promotes while representing us never gives us our court date just leaves us exposed once it lodged courts and they are named, and they had threatened more than one victim, yet he a solicitor acting on our behalf representing us as clients with his firm yet still promoted the school this is your MP from Federal Government now a deputy Mayor who professes to help the community. Total disregard for any safety of the plaintiffs and all evidence destroyed it goes too deep in detail but It will be exposed soon I can tell literally hundreds of children detailed torture and abuse, by witness How they have got away with it , nothing to see here folks this was in the public interest to expose and this was a solicitor and MP For Federal labour Rudd government yet he leaves his clients vulnerable and promoted the very school no exposure e to how evil this palace was but encourages children and parents to enroll as education promotion, for his campaign for seat of flynn knowing what he knew and lodged filed with courts civil claim and description how disgraceful of a person we elect to keep our interest at heart and protect our rights none of which this man did utter disgrace,when I say hundreds I mean hundreds abused, in three terms i and five at a time and so on or one at a time while child waited outside could hear the abuse or made to watch while they tortured and use a specific method to paralyze the children only they can know how this was done, and it rendered them paralyzed whilst they were cut into by the named perpetrators I had named with courts from this school in 2004. When the child came out of the numbed paralysis the pain of the torturer and cut into they were screaming apparently and then given anesthetic they had every means of drugs hypodermic needles and fluoride. The thing is a boy was witnessed as having his hip cut into bone removed and then fluoride and ice inserted into his hips. The witness saw this first stage. A day later or so the boy came to tell the witness the rest of the story that he had gone to the doctor and the doctor had said what was the hip marks the boy must have told him he was cut into and the doctor was check for asthma this boy could have died from asthma attack in the office, from what he went through they would not have cared a lot of children came within an inch of their lives in that office,now as the doctor then investigated and said that the boy had a dose of fluoride and ice inserted into his bone hips and had the doctor not seen it the boy would have had to had pins and or be in a wheelchair now this boy was obviously told to look for the witness who saw him being harmed and cut into in the office, So a doctor in town knows this boy was tortured and this was a premeditated act to destroy this little boy had the doctor not found it or boy not had an appointment The boy was also skinned of flesh off this boy and other torture sen so this is the extent to what these people did, and then all of this as all evidence was with the solicitor in full fourteen or so pages of evidence of what eh witness saw. But nothing to see here folks what should have been exposed at the civil action was covered up and witnesses not protected this up to Labur Rudd government he was a Federal MP for the Labour rudd government and promotes a school with the very litigation client have against the school he is promoting, where did his allegiance lie, conflict of interest and endangering other victims by promoting this school but will be exposed soon I had named on the court documents with local courts, yet now we left undefended and all evidence was with the very solicitors firm owner who knows the full extent of all abuse has our evidence now promotes this child abusing school to innocent student. The Torture of them the children and premeditated torture details too horrific to go into. Just given an indication that there was another client on the solicitors books and one child had tired to find the witness who saw him in the office so someone wanted the boy who had the fluoride inserted to locate the witness he found the witness and started a discussion of the rest of what happened ot hi when he went to the Doctor so a child now an adult is out there and a local doctor knows this boy was tortured and Yet when the 2003 Principal was forced to resign long story twice he still kept on with Diocese after what he did and was to be rewarded new position to be with children again then I found a new victim, who was and not protected but abused mentally over the abuse further, in the office in 2003 and no mandatory reporting ever would take place the perfect pedophile child abusing school of St Johns in Gladstone Queensland, many of the teaches staff had their children in the school at that time and no one protected these children as teachers allowed the children out of class for hours and came back to class saying they were harmed and told do not care’ teachers saw a boy so beaten in class and did nothing all class saw it happen daily and then child taken to office to be tortured and all involved office staff included. and evidence he had to permanently resign but Diocese reward their abusers. Children in school now they have all the hours to abuse children, as it is the domain of the teachers, and this was the worst including office staff in n the abuse and class teachers seeing with the class a Child beaten in front of class till the fell and then he is taken to the office but the teachers of the class do nothing but watch, all and many involved in 2004 and parents wonder why children are crying and wetting bed and hiding in corners and nervous as once very outgoing, this was more than one child at the school in 2004 showing these symptom and all were abused in office all three landed up together now nervous wrecks at the local stat school together and witnessed each other being abused at St Johns that was showing these symptoms too. this how many years this went on at that school after the 2004, did any child continue to be abused as the perpetrators only once lodged courts seemed to resign and quickly as solicitors of this firm had other clients on books too, same complaint yet now all evidence destroyed, makes one think how many cover for and have information for acting for us and yet promoting the opposition with all our evidence, this is how they operate then destroy the evidence if any child was harmed after the fourth term of 2004, then they should come forward as now I had the civil solicitor in the school with his child and he was acting on my behalf through the MPs for Federal Labour owners firm all conflict of interest makes them all responsible as they knew, if any child suffers further from 2004 onward as many government and other departments notified this going back to 2003 when Ken smith removed the first principal but all lied about his resignation as well too deep to go into detail, yet if Ken smith could see a screamingly obvious situation and had the first principal removed in 2003 also l named and lodged with courts , Then how did the 2004 abuse on such a scale with no surveillance hundreds abused and tortured, yet I had continued to ask for investigation as it was to do with a child who was not rescued and they said they were in an incestuous situation in 2003 they were not rescued, and the teacher warned this oy parent of issue he would not when all is revealed on any level be rescued and the teacher knew I was calling th police for this boy for what he said happens at home with him and his siblings the teacher was told by me what the boy was aing she ten told his parent how can you let innocent child when the teacher was fully aware of situation as was the First principal even had written evidence but did no the and this to the investigating police man as police knew nothing until after the police interview father was involved and what had occurred at the the story altering stories of children so it like mild child paly from horrific abuse said to have happened,and alerting of parents of the boy who said his parents sexually molesting him and his siblings at the school of st johns in 2003, So the principal perverted the course of justice and aided and abetted a crime against a child and lied to police fobbed off the police man as truth only told to the Juvenile e aid policeman after I had to write that the boys father involved and did the detective who I had gone into see so specifically with this information could it be relayed to the Juvenile Aid worker to have a last ditch attempt to try after everyone at school teacher and principal waned the alleged pedophile parents of this child would be relayed to the interviewing office and this information so critical for the boy to get out of the situation this information that the father involved and the statement was written down but not passed on with the parent I said in familial position with the child she warns the parents and then this is how the story starts in 2003 with removal of the first principal this same child now would be abused in the office by perpetrators of the school in 2004 he had no where to turn and this is after child commission written to and brave harts I hope this boy sues as from the start the police and the school stopped him fro having natural justice, even a last ditch attempt of him being saved I went in to police station and said the father was involved with the boy and his siblings this not relayed to the Juvenile aid worker who would later interview the boy I had reported it out school not the school they the teacher and the first year principals wand he alleged pedophile parents and children bought to the office to have their stories altered, how can one later a story of sexual abuse to stick in the side so that now I was calling the police for this boy the trying to alter stories before police arrive thus aiding abetting a crime against the child being n this pedophile parental situation and warning the parents of impending police visit, as I had to mandatory report out not the teacher and principal who knew all of what the boy said his family do it together the whole family, and not one of the protected the boy both teacher knowing what I heard from the boy had said I told her I was calling the police for the boy as his parents involved she warns the parents of issue, and so now he stood no chance his parents the abusers now in the interview with where was the boys justice or right to tell his ttth then the principal also has the boy in office forced altered stories and his parent warned the boy and his sibling stood no chance his before the both up by police who did not relay the information and only know after too that the father was involved once I correspondence with him and he the juvenile worker did not get the information of the father being relayed to him by the detective, utter betrayal of a child, he now said he was sill in situation at home even when he had lied for his parents now he knew what they were doing was wrong but according to him the still molested him even after police interview in which all stories forced to change thanks to the teacher warning his parents the first safe haven and she protected pedophile alleged parents did the First principal got off on the sexual abuse of the children with another vice principal present in the office who should have been investigated as well as this woman would turn out to be a serial child abuser and tortures in with the other staff in 2004. He lied for his parents now to protect them by force had his story changed to we all do it at home to I did it but saw it on Mr Bean, no sexual connotations on Mr Bean the comedy. utter betrayal how many years as he now abuse victim in 2004 in office as witness saw him being vilely abused and molested by the perpetrators as as witness saw him being abused this child now nowhere to go he and sibling a victim at home and predators now can have him anytime at school in 2004. His voice only I heard silenced by his teacher who warned his parents and could have rescued him she had been the years how many others had she treats this way the principal in 2003 had alerted parents over the child not once but found anther victim had to have him removed even though he reigned Diocese still to get new position then found the new victim told Diocese I would go to media if got new position . Still more to story How long after 2004 were children harmed and the boy who was in the office in 2004 once he could not be rescued as all sabotaged his chance of rescue by warning his parents now harmed by these perpetrators with full knowledge in 2004 by the solicitors, police that these were child torturers pedophiles teachers staff at the school , some of the staff there till 2007 when my claim lodged with the courts then they scattered and resigned.The boy had his story altered but told a witness he was still being molested at home what a betrayal of this first child and his sibling and the school would rather protect pedophile parents as it turned out than innocent children just a tip of the ice berg here as to what occurred, and yet how did 2004 happen and solicitors already had extensive paperwork from the 2003 incidences at the school. Many of the police do not investigate thoroughly in this case was to alert the very perpetrators in 2004 after now the 2004 incidence police go up to school and interview the perpetrators which in fact is alerting them someone has complained and they know that someone has seen hundreds being tortured molested and violated on such a level, now all evidence will be lost as now solicitor now destroys my evidence ans yet through his firm lodged actually served the defendant and never gave me a court date , just delayed deferred saying courts busy’ knowing I had given them proof more victims in 2003 witnesses, documents of proof and and in 2004 new client on their books , identical claim against same perpetrators and other victims who Had contacted and verified they too hared , so nothing to do but go an settle but now why did not the very solicitor of firm I had my claim all evidence and hen hundreds of children more evidence detailed incidences of victims seen by witness yet all covered up and this did go up to Federal Member of Parliament for Labor who was a solicitor had a duty of care to all of his constituents, and community to warn then against enrolling in this dangerous school he is promoting it and that was utterly irresponsible to any children victims still in the school but would rather they not know this is a child abusing pedophile school he promotes the school and the Diocese who I have ligation against he is the solicitor representing his client myself on his firm and he promoting the very school was in the public interest no child was safe and if any were harmed from 2004 onward in September then are a lot of people to answer to if anymore children were harmed at St Johns after the solicitor knew had evidence and others knew, and never exposes the truth all evidence destroyed. The new client victim from torture abuse in 2004 on the same solicitors books from the same school he was witnessed being beaten assaulted before taken to office and other witnesses saw him tortured abused in office, in 2004 still have not got court date how is that so when that in itself is one cannot destroy evidence to be used in coming court case, or with al the details used for other victims to identify themselves fro the paperwork, this was incriminating evidence and he himself a criminal lawyer knew one cannot destroy evidence as I had ot had the court settlement and this for others to use as witness and victim one saw the witness as the victim being tortured i specific way this on the detailed paperwork given now destroyed, and if not settled and it was on the solicitors lodged with his firm now destroy my evidence whilst promoting the Diocese who I have lodged with the courts but he is promoting the Diocese and school, where I am litigating against and has all my evidence who did he have allegiance to utter disgrace then evidence destroyed yet no court date yet someone had complained of abuse so now they can regroup and loose evidence the school was suddenly renovated an d all carpets that would have shown hundreds of dna was gone and wall painted and so forth how convenient but too many children and too many details of their torture very specific done by these perpetrator named but nothing to see here folks all covered up by a solicitor who became e a MP for federal parliament of Labour no child is safe until this is full exposed as it will be and too much detail but will be exposed too many involved in covering for these pedophile rings, masons. now the very school and Diocese and he is promoting a child abusing torturing school is this what a deputy mayor an then to be MP Federal stand for not against as we never got the court date yet it loged and served from this firm who promotes the school leaves the plaintiffs undefended and destroys our evidence, but even deeper which cannot explain until expose it all.

    July 3, 2018

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: